Talk:Live at Wembley (Beyoncé album)/GA1

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Hahc21 (talk · contribs) 02:32, 29 April 2012 (UTC)

Hi All. I'll be reviewing this article for the next few weeks. --Hahc21 (talk) 02:32, 29 April 2012 (UTC)

Round 1

I've seen some things on the article that i believe needs to be extended:

1. The allmusic review doesn't have quotation. It needs one.

The grade on the website is all. The author didn't review anything except giving a grade.

Mmm ok. Ok. So the're nothing to be done on that. --Hahc21 (talk) 21:36, 1 May 2012 (UTC)

1. The information regarding the DVD release and the single release should be in different paragraphs to avoid confusion.  Done

Round 2

• I've found some problems with 4 references. I've fixed 3 of them. The 4th is a link which needs registration to read info, so there's nothing to do with it.

OK.

• I've also modified some lines to match the formatting...

OK.

• About the reception section: How many critics reviewed the DVD? Only the allmusic score is mentioned. I'll make a little search to see what i find. Please somebody also help me in this...

--Hahc21 (talk) 21:45, 1 May 2012 (UTC)

Believe me; everything I could find is in the article. There are no other professional reviews other than the Allmusic review. So there's just one review. However, it also appeared in Vibe's list of "Get in Tune With New Music" and influenced singer Adam Lambert...

Round 3

Ok. External research is done. Nothing new to add. Please don't forget to sign the posts... :)

Now, i'll spend the next day checking the syntax and semantics more in detail and applying changes in order were needed --Hahc21 (talk) 03:24, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

I've checked the syntax and semantics already. I'll make a final read tomorrow and put the article against the GA criteria to make my final vote. --Hahc21 (talk) 05:02, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

The Verdict

Ok, it was a rainy day so i stayed in home today. I've checked the article again and is ready. Congratulations to all who worked on the article, most of all to My love is love (talk · contribs) for his great job. Here, my final verdict:

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·

Final commentary: Live at Wembley cannot be further improved and it covers the topic very broadly. It is well-written, information is correctly organized and is factually accurate and verifiable. This means that it complies with all the good article criteria and then it's promoted to good article status.

Thank you. My love is love (talk) 16:35, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.