Talk:Living for Love/GA1

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Calvin999 (talk · contribs) 08:15, 3 June 2015 (UTC)

Great! Thanks Calvin. —Indian:BIO ^{[ ChitChat ]} 08:27, 3 June 2015 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Calvin999 and I am reviewing this article.

Review

• One dab link
• NY Daily News says there's a connection issue, but works fine for me. There's a problem with the CNBC link. Radio airplay link isn't found

• I'd put Interscope before Live Nation in the info box to make it alphabetical.
• numerous versions composed → numerous remixes composed (?)
• and piano, → Perhaps mention that Alicia Keys plays piano.
• and have the lyrics as uplifting in nature, → and make the lyrics more uplifting
• dressedlike → Typo
• The storyline included mythology and showed Madonna as a matador, fighting her dancers dressedlike minotaurs in a red circular stage. It had numerous costume changes, → Present tense, it still available to watch as such.
• "Living for Love" was additionally performed on Le Grand Journal and The Ellen DeGeneres Show. → I'd probably say "Alternate versions of..."
• commented how she → commented on how she
• The block quote shouldn't have a quotation mark at the end.
• is an EDM house song → is an EDM and house song
• 2014 and 2015 peaks are supposed to be placed in separate tables.
• Ref 1: Billboard needs linking
• Ref 3: Rolling Stone needs linking
• Some refs have work and publisher, some just one or the other. I generally think that publisher parameters are not required anymore, so Apple Inc. and Hearst Magazine etc. can be removed.
• Ref 10: Rolling Stone needs unlinking.
• Ref 14: Digital Spy needs linking
• Ref 22: Has double quotation marks in the title. Same for 57 and 95.
• Ref 28: Time needs linking
• Ref 95: Digital Spy should not be in italics
• Ref 96 is overlinking BBC News as it is already linked in 58

Summary

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:

   B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. Has an appropriate reference section:

   B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:

   B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

On hold for 7 days.  — Calvin999 08:49, 5 June 2015 (UTC)

Calvin999 I did everything, except the dab, sadly I cannot open the dablinks url again, I don't know why these tools are not working on my laptop. —Indian:BIO ^{[ ChitChat ]} 10:23, 5 June 2015 (UTC)

Neither can I.  — Calvin999 10:43, 5 June 2015 (UTC)

Outcome

Pass or Fail:  — Calvin999 10:43, 5 June 2015 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.