Talk:Llangorse Lake

Photo

Why was the photograph of Llangorse lake removed? The photograph was not copywrited and as I took the photo myself, the lake is common ground and there were no other people visable in the photo, it was a good quality photograph, relevent to the article and not too large.

So the only reason I can think of for it's removal is vandalisam. I am adding the picture to the article again to correct the vandalisam.

--Shearluck 14:54, 19 November 2006 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Llangorse Lake. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061112045821/http://www.brecon-beacons.com/llangorse-lake.htm to http://www.brecon-beacons.com/llangorse-lake.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061112045821/http://www.brecon-beacons.com/llangorse-lake.htm to http://www.brecon-beacons.com/llangorse-lake.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:22, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

Area of lake

I doubted the figure of 139 ha and so independently measured the area of the water surface at 127 ha but since that is original research it cannot be incorporated into the article. I initially made some changes in reference to a further figure but have since self-reverted. Geopersona (talk) 15:03, 10 February 2024 (UTC)