Talk:Loaded language/Archives/2018


Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Loaded language. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:56, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

Structure and tone unfit for encyclopedia

The structure of this article has an excessively long lead and relies largely on one source. The article is also slanted and reads like an essay.-----Mr. Guye (talk) 02:26, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

This article is definitely an essay and besides relying so heavily on the few sources it does cite, it also states that Orwell discussed this so-called "loaded" language. He did, just not the way the author wants us to think he did. What Orwell studied was the corruption of english language, Verborrhea if you want it to be called that. definitely not up to Wikipedia standard. Ariodant (talk) 17:00, 18 October 2018 (UTC)