Talk:Lochleven Castle

Latest comment: 3 years ago by Richard Nevell in topic Loch Leven or Lochleven Castle?
Good articleLochleven Castle has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
December 9, 2008Good article nomineeListed

Mary queen of scots haunting

edit

Her freedom was short-lived however, and Mary ended up prisoner at Loch Leven Castle, where her spirit is said to have lingered, long after another great escape. http://news.scotsman.com/spookystories/Haunted-trail-of-Mary-Queen.2684937.jp — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.208.26.179 (talk) 16:17, 9 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Loch Leven or Lochleven Castle?

edit

This article title is Loch Leven Castle but the more common usage seems to be Lochleven castle. This is the usage of Historic Scotland who run the site. [1] It is also in Fraser, Antonia. (1970) Mary Queen of Scots as Lochleven. Looking at the internet it is only less reputable sources that use Loch Leven Castle. Does anyone know why the article is titled as it is?--Jhood1 (talk) 11:14, 21 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Yes, the name of the castle is "Lochleven Castle".Unoquha (talk) 22:36, 21 April 2020 (UTC)Reply
I have changed the name of article back to the usual name of the castle, Lochleven Castle. There had been evident confusion with the name of surrounding body of water, which is called Loch Leven. The name "Loch Leven Castle" is not used.Unoquha (talk) 13:59, 26 October 2021 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for doing this, Unoquha. Richard Nevell (talk) 13:53, 31 October 2021 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Loch Leven Castle. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:26, 14 December 2017 (UTC)Reply