Talk:Lockheed CL-400 Suntan
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | This article deals with a military black project.
Because of the nature of such projects, the most authoritative sources (any involved governments and defense contractors) may not even acknowledge its existence. The most reliable sources may be highly speculative. Please ensure that the article is well and reliably sourced and does not contain unverifiable information or vague predictions.For more details, see the black project working group of the military history project. |
redirect? merge?
editIt is my opinion that this should not be redirected from suntan as the use of suntan with aircraft is likely unheard of. I'm ex air force and son of a 21 year vet, never heard of the SR-71 called "suntan". Even so, there are no cites, no real information or way to verify the info, and not enough information to justify a seperate article and a redirect. I have removed the redirect for now.
I also feel it should be merged into SR-71 Blackbird as a subsection rather than be a stand alone article for the same reasons, along with the proper cites to substantiate the claims.
- I renamed the article with the full name and removed the tags after significant editing. I will also try to make some links here. Knotnic 01:00, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
No redirect or merge. What would be the reasoning? This project is tangentially-related to the SR-71 in the same way the 747 is related to the &27, 737, and so on. Keep as a separate article. Jgw (talk) 17:01, 5 September 2009 (UTC)