Talk:Lockheed Martin
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Lockheed Martin article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| Archives: 1 |
 | This  level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
How many employees?
editI am an employee of LM and I was just looking to see how many other employees there are. This article says both 140,000 (in body) and 126,000 (in sidebar). Which is it? I don't see references for either. Based on my later searches, I'd say the smaller number is likely more accurate, but I prefer to let an unbiased person make the update. http://www.lockheedmartin.com/aboutus/index.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.91.173.42 (talk) 22:57, 2 September 2011 (UTC)
It was 140,000 a few years ago; lockheed's workforce has been shrinking and is down to around 125k. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.249.147.66 (talk) 08:57, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
- The 2015 Annual Report states 126 thousand (page 10), I have added a reference on that. Ulflarsen (talk) 16:50, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
redirect has been placed on page
editthe lockheed_martin page source which appears to have been sabotaged by a page redirect specified in line 494 of the page source: Gelegnite (talk) 04:07, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
- This has been resolved elsewhere. Thanks. -- zzuuzz (talk) 06:56, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
- why you think that?, however now is all ok.--Bolzanobozen (talk) 15:56, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
Update some dates?
editThe overview at the beginning of the article contains important information linked to years from the late 2000s to the early 2010s. I recommend we update this information with information from more recent years. Brom20110101 (talk) 04:47, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
Distribution Technologies
editThere appear to be no mention of "Distribution Technologies". Here is an excerpt from a page on the USPS: Lockheed Martin Distribution Technologies designs, produces and integrates mail automation, material handling, recognition and information processing systems for postal services, package delivery operations, corporate mail centers, and distribution, fulfillment and manufacturing centers worldwide. Distribution Technologies is a business unit of Lockheed Martin Systems Integration - Owego, which is a business segment of Lockheed Martin Corporation, Bethesda, MD. This is from [1]https://www.postalreporter.com/automation.htm#:~:text=Lockheed%20Martin%20Distribution%20Technologies%20designs,fulfillment%20and%20manufacturing%20centers%20worldwide. 216.82.37.98 (talk) 13:58, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
why is the logo so small
editin the article this might just be for me but the logo is tiny Jatanea (talk) 23:41, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- It was vandalism. Fixed. Schierbecker (talk) 23:45, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Carbon Footprint Question
editIs there a reason why 'Carbon footprint' has it's own top level section? I have not seen this on any other corporation wiki's. On others (ex. Google) it's a subsection as part of a larger discussion of internal affairs. Purplecarpark (talk) 20:40, 18 August 2024 (UTC)