Talk:Lockheed XH-51

Serial numbers

Apparently there is a discrepancy as to the serial numbers that exist at the Army Aviation Museum at Fort Rucker, Alabama. Or just the numbers that exist on the aircraft in particular. The numbers in the article are straight off of the Army Aviation Museum's collection list, although I will write them and request clarification, since the serial group the Army started off with is 15 not 51, and is now around 26 or 27. This would seem to lend itself to the smaller number in many pictures, which if the Army's serial number pattern holds should be 15262 or 15263. If the number really is 51 instead of 15, that my be an acknowledgment of the aircraft's X-number and to distinguish it from any similar serial numbers acquired during the same year. As it is, there are several different versions of what the serial numbers of the aircraft should be rather than any definitive proof as to what they are. However, I hold that the owner of the two aircraft in question is probably slightly more reliable than anecdotal references, even in printed references, that seem to disagree with each other. --Born2flie 17:53, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lockheed XH-51. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.armyavnmuseum.org/museum/collection/rw4.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 19:17, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Lockheed XH-51/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Comment(s)

Press [show] to view →

==Comments== Born2flie: No images and very little documentation. Originally Lockheed production Model 86, it was the Model 186 (1st development of the base model) that ultimately became the XH-51A and XH-51A Compound. The aircraft were procured for a joint Army-Navy program testing high-speed helicopter flight with the rigid-rotor design. The Army also conducted an evaluation to determine the effect of speed on an enemy's ability to acquire and target helicopters. The study's conclusion was that a compound helicopter was much more survivable than a conventional helicopter. This study became a factor in the Army's decision to make the AAFSS requirement for a compound helicopter. The subsequent development of the helicopter, Model 286 was certified with the FAA and an attempt was made to market it to the civilian market. One model 286 crashed during a test flight according to the NTSB's accident database. This aircraft was also designated as design CL-595,[1] the "CL" indicating the model was a Lockheed design from the Van Nuys, California Lockheed plant. --Born2flie 05:10, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

Last edited at 16:50, 2 September 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 22:23, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Lockheed XH-51. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.nasm.si.edu/research/aero/aircraft/lockheed_cl475.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060927042104/http://www.vtol.org/pdf/summer06robb.pdf to http://www.vtol.org/pdf/summer06robb.pdf
• Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/5JNrx2yIy?url=http://www.vtol.org/History.htm to http://www.vtol.org/History.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:42, 25 May 2017 (UTC)