 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
The Logic Alphabet should be compared with other, historically competing "iconic" binary logical-connective notations like those of Charles S. Peirce, Jerome Frazee, G. Spencer Brown, and Glenn Clark, as well as other "operations on connectives" in work of Karl Menger, A. Stern's "Matrix Logic", and others. Also, Entitative Graphs, Existential Graphs, Conceptual Graphs, and VennLISP. Also, "logically onomatopoeic" connectives in certain constructed languages like Loglan and Lojban.
The Logic Alphabet, unlike some of its linear notation competitors, has the possible "defect" that symmetric binary connectives have logical symbols that are not left-right bilaterally symmetric.65.19.15.158 (talk) 10:05, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
- The IP is rigt. Zellweger makes the same mistake like Boby Lapointe with his fr:Numération Bibi. Sorry, but I concider that rather primitive.
- Greetings... --T.P. (talk) 21:08, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
Picture avilable
editFile:Zellweger-LogicGarnet.jpg
Image:Zellweger-LogicGarnet.jpg
Saeed.Veradi 08:44, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
Wow!
editThe Symbols shown under Content are a bit sparse. Aren’t they? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.229.109.29 (talk) 20:57, 25 September 2024 (UTC)