Talk:Loma Linda, California

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

This article is biased

edit

when you read the article, it puts down its neighboring towns. i thought that a encyclopedia has to be neutral. this article is not neutral. needs to be revised in order to have neutrality 75.16.41.60 (talk) 20:00, 30 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

There are also good parts of Colton and San Bernardino, plus when you get down to Grand Terrace, California towards Riverside rated one of the 100-150 best places to live in the early 2010's according to two quality of living standards surveys of all of the US' major cities and suburban communities, and Loma Linda falls in the same list (I read at #85, while Grand Terrace was at #114) including considerations for local climate, property values and closeness to good-paying jobs. 71.102.21.238 (talk) 22:35, 25 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

History

edit

Here are some resources for anyone who'd like to take a crack at writing up a history section:

--TorriTorri(Talk to me!) 22:54, 7 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Loma Linda, California. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

 Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 09:54, 24 February 2016 (UTC)Reply


Claim that the largest supermarket does not sell meat

edit

I'm skeptical about this claim. None of the three footnotes following it reference this claim directly. Loma Linda Market (to which I guess the claim refers) doesn't sell meat at all, but Staters and Wal-Mart certainly do, and I'm pretty sure that Clark's sells a very small range of organic, non-GMO meat as well. All three have a much larger square footage than Loma Linda Market. Remember - only around 40% of the city's population are Adventists, and not all Adventists are strictly and totally vegetarian. LDGE (talk) 05:15, 22 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Rephrased per sources. James (talk/contribs) 23:32, 22 December 2016 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Loma Linda, California. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:18, 25 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Loma Linda, California. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:56, 5 January 2018 (UTC)Reply