Talk:London Internet Exchange

London Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Internet Low‑importance

	Internet portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InternetWikipedia:WikiProject InternetTemplate:WikiProject InternetInternet articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Investigatory Powers Act

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The comment under '2017' about the Investigatory Powers Act will need to be updated soon (once the conference has happened). The most relevant new comment on all this I know of is [1] but rather than following every twist and turn in the story it may be best to wait a few days till the dust has settled. Marinheiro (talk) 21:29, 20 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Comments

Latest comment: 18 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

The article on the Amsterdam Internet Exchange claims that the AMS-IX is the largest in the world, when measured by traffic. The Linx article claims that Linx is the largest. Who am I supposed to believe? 80.126.182.118 13:26, 2 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

The statistics on their own websites show that AMS-IX is the largest. See also List of Internet Exchange Points by size. - Ilse @ 02:39, 10 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

"LINX provides links to many external internet exchanges, such as INEX in Ireland." I don't think that is correct.

Xchangepoint is closed, right? Maybe we should remove it from the See also...

Multiple Issues

I changed the three issues at the top of the article and placed them in to a { { Multiple issues } } template so that they would take up less space on the page.tedjam (talk)

Add topic