Talk:London Philharmonic Orchestra/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: 3family6 (talk · contribs) 20:32, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall: A very well-done article, I only have question about a single image caption.

Y Resolved.--¿3family6 _contribs 16:31, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

1. Pass/Fail:

Comments

This article is excellent, I think that the peer review back in September ironed out any wrinkles. Prose is solid, scope is well balanced, content is presented neutrally, referencing is excellent, images have suitable licensing. My only problem with this article is that the programme of the first LPO concert is an artistic rendering, not an actual photo. I have no problem with this, but I think the caption should specify that it is a reproduction.--¿3family6 _contribs 00:49, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

Fair point. How do you feel about the addition I've just made? Please feel free to adjust if you like. Tim riley talk 11:26, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

Looks good. Approved!--¿3family6 _contribs 16:31, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

Thank you for the review, and the kind remarks you make, above. Tim riley talk 19:15, 18 November 2014 (UTC)