This article is within the scope of WikiProject Kent, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the county of Kent in South East England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.KentWikipedia:WikiProject KentTemplate:WikiProject KentKent-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Surrey, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Surrey on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SurreyWikipedia:WikiProject SurreyTemplate:WikiProject SurreySurrey-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject River Thames, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.River ThamesWikipedia:WikiProject River ThamesTemplate:WikiProject River ThamesRiver Thames articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Latest comment: 16 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
A London Assembly standard letter re access to the River Thames - PDF (view as HTML) states every such right [of access] must have been in existence since 1189. It does not explain why 1189 but that year may well be the year of purchase from Dick 1 which Spelthorne thinks was 1197. -- RHaworth03:29, 14 February 2007 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Quote: It was also the next bridge upstream from London Bridge, a distance of 31 km as the crow flies.
I thought Kingston-upon-Thames bridge (built in the 12th century) was the next bridge upstream from London Bridge in medieval times. Can anyone confirm the Staines claim? John O'London (talk) 17:43, 11 March 2013 (UTC)Reply
