Talk:London and Provincial Fuselage Biplane
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I am a bit sceptical about the name of this aircraft. The author seems to have based it solely on a contemporary Flight article, when aviation publications were notorious for making up their own names for aircraft. Anybody any reference OTHER than the 1916 Flight article?Petebutt (talk) 17:49, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
- Trying to relate this to the L & P Type 4 (and sometimes called the L & P Biplane) which was designed by Fletcher in 1916, a two-seater with a Gnome engine, (G-EABQ, G-EABR, G-EABS and G-EADT) and improved variant was Anzani engined G-EAQW which is also mentioned in this article. All a bit confusuing. MilborneOne (talk) 17:37, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on London and Provincial Fuselage Biplane. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101205124951/http://www.goldenyears.ukf.net/reg_G-E.htm to http://www.goldenyears.ukf.net/reg_G-E.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:34, 5 January 2018 (UTC)