Talk:Lone Teepee

Proposed merge with Battle of the Little Big Horn

By itself; this article doesn't really give a whole lot. It's briefly mentioned in the one source given and it's hard to search for something like this. I believe it would do much better in the Battle of the Little Big Horn article. The Undead Never Die (talk) 02:27, 24 August 2015 (UTC)

It is amazing that this article was created in 2006 and has remained an unimproved stub since. How it has escaped a speedy deletion nomination is equally amazing. If we created (and allowed to remain) articles with only a brief mention in a reference we could have millions of additional articles. I am not actually a deletionist but value their worth on Wikipedia.

This discussion timeline has expired without resolution. This stub could not be logically argued as worthy to occupy article space, by even the most ardent supporter, so I can not imagine a bold moved would have been (or would be) contested. I will submit historical significance of the Lone Teepee (and a half) but it can be covered elsewhere. I have not looked to see if it would be better at the proposed merge location or Battle of the Rosebud, where it receives no prominence, and where a "brief" mention in a reference will suffice for added content. Otr500 (talk) 12:39, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

But how do you merge them? MossyCobble255 (talk) 01:41, 6 November 2015 (UTC)

Move text from here to the other article and change this into a redirect. And yes, it should be done.Volunteer Marek (talk) 09:12, 14 May 2016 (UTC)

• Support merge - While I am not sure we need all this material merged, it should indeed be merged. Soon. Jusdafax 10:42, 5 June 2016 (UTC)
• Support as per above reasoning Liar's Lair (talk) 02:24, 27 September 2016 (UTC)

Since consensus was to move (and I agree) I merged info into the Battle of the Little Big Horn article and redirected link there. Thorkall (talk) 03:25, 25 January 2017 (UTC)