Talk:Long-distance Amtrak routes

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by the Passenger trains task force.

It is requested that an a map be included in this article to improve its quality. Please work with the Maps task force to create and add a map to this article.

United States

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Feedback from New Page Review process

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: I do not see any source supporting the title "Amtrak Long Distance".

Trainsandotherthings (talk) 22:32, 29 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Timeline labels

Latest comment: 1 month ago3 comments2 people in discussion

In keeping with MOS:NAMESANDTITLES, I've been trying to get the labels in the timeline to render in italics, but my wiki-fu is not strong enough to make that happen. -MJ (talk) 18:26, 3 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

The timeline generator is super wonky and doesn't seem to support all kinds of standard functions. I think it's still useful, but I'm wondering if there is a better alternative available. QuincyMorgan (talk) 18:47, 3 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

I agree that this is probably a relevant visualization of data, but the lack of flexible formatting is just unfortunate. -MJ (talk) 22:27, 3 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Add topic