Talk:Long reliever

Baseball High‑importance

	Baseball portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Baseball, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of baseball on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BaseballWikipedia:WikiProject BaseballTemplate:WikiProject BaseballBaseball articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

"Least effective"

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I put a "citation needed" tag on the partial-sentence "a long reliever is often a team's least effective pitcher". This may be true, but to me it seems questionable. If the starting pitcher has given up several (or more) runs in the first few innings and it's not getting better (which is the most common reason why he would be taken out so early), you want a guy who is hopefully going to "get the game under control" (as the article says elsewhere). Since his team is now down, let's say for example, five runs, the only way to "get the game under control" is to give up no runs, or maybe at most, one run and hope his team scores some runs (or in the NL, help his team score some runs). For that, a team is going to rely on its "least effective pitcher"? I don't see the logic. Neutron (talk) 16:02, 31 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic