Talk:Looj
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Looj article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This page was proposed for deletion by an editor in the past. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
 | It is requested that an image or photograph of Looj be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible. The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Criticism section
editSeems to be poorly reviewed and not a robot at all. Perhaps add a crit section? Turkeyphant 14:37, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
Possible merge with iRobot page?
editThe Looj section on the iRobot page is just one sentence long, but I believe that some information can be taken from this page and added to the iRobot page. However, a significant amount of information on this page is blatantly unencyclopedic. Information such as all of the model numbers, dimensions of the robot and that the battery must be removed before charging are completely unnecessary to a reader of wikipedia and if someone really needs to find the specific dimensions of the Looj robot, they can find it elsewhere on specialist sites. Common sense must be applied with regard to the level of detail to be included. This makes the whole page seem like an advertisement or an owners manual rather than an article, especially since the Looj has recieved generally unfavorable reviews and only a positive review is mentioned in "critical reception". Moreover, the information listed is not properly sourced. I am also concerned that the Looj robot is not that notable to have its own article with such a high degree of detail and a mention on the iRobot page is sufficent.
I am not trying to shame this article, but I do believe that it has serious issues. Please let me know what you think. I will be adding info to the iRobot page and may then nominate the page for deletion.A Nebraska Cornhusker (talk) 19:00, 27 May 2016 (UTC)