Talk:Look What We Made Taylor Swift Do
Latest comment: 9 months ago by AirshipJungleman29 in topic Did you know nomination
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 17 January 2024. The result of the discussion was redirect. |
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Look What We Made Taylor Swift Do redirect. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information. |
| This page was proposed for deletion by Averageattorney (talk · contribs) on 10 January 2024 with the comment: An opinion piece isn't notable enough to warrant an article It was contested by CJ-Moki (talk · contribs) on 2024-01-10 with the comment: The piece has been covered in several reliable sources |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
Feedback from New Page Review process
editI left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: Hello my friend! Good day to you. Thanks for creating the article, I have marked it as reviewed. Have a blessed day!
Did you know nomination
edit- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: rejected by reviewer, closed by AirshipJungleman29 talk 20:12, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
( )
.png)
Taylor Swift in 2023
- ... that The New York Times published an opinion piece promoting a conspiracy theory about Taylor Swift (pictured)'s sexuality? Source: https://www.thepinknews.com/2024/01/08/taylor-swift-new-york-times-sexuality-chely-wright-social-media/
Created by CJ-Moki (talk). Self-nominated at 04:41, 9 January 2024 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Look What We Made Taylor Swift Do; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
| General: Article is new enough and long enough |
|---|
| Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
|---|
|
| Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
|---|
|
Image eligibility:
- Freely licensed:
- Used in article:
- Clear at 100px:
| QPQ: Done. |
Overall: 
Article is new enough to generate some interest. For the hook, maybe change the final part to "the sexuality of Taylor Swift (pictured)". If we want to keep the picture, it reads a little awkward as "Taylor Swift (pictured)'s". For the source, could we change it to The Guardian one? I'm unfamiliar with thepinknews.com and no for a fact The Guardian is reliable and basically confirms the hook as well. Maybe a suggestion for an alternate hook would be to relate the opinion piece to the "Gaylor" Swifties?
- @Zmbro: Thank you for reviewing this nomination. I have changed the image here to now use the image used in the article. Consensus is that PinkNews is generally reliable. In accordance with your suggestion, here is ALT1:
- ALT1: ... that The New York Times published an opinion piece promoting a conspiracy theory about the sexuality of Taylor Swift (pictured)? Source: https://www.thepinknews.com/2024/01/08/taylor-swift-new-york-times-sexuality-chely-wright-social-media/
- CJ-Moki (talk) 18:07, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
- Perfect!
Approved – zmbro (talk) (cont) 19:52, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
- Zmbro, I don't know if this matters from the DYK-side at all, but FYI I nominated the article for deletion. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 10:11, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
article is on hold until the AfD resolves. theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 03:49, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
- Resolved. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 10:41, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
- Perfect!
