This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
NPOV
editWow. I've never seen someone who's been dead for over 100 years described with such venom. He may have been all of the things the article suggests, but the tone is wrong. I would suggest more direct quotes from the references. Megapixie 03:07, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
Much of the information comes from this source: [1] at cricinfo, and there are several other sources quoted in this website. Each one of them describe him as a vile man. Vsanborn (talk) 19:25, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
I just wanted to add this source [A Single Wicket Scandal http://www.cricinfo.com/columns/content/story/379180.html] which also confirms that The Honourable Reverend Lord Frederick Beauclerk was considered a vile scoundrel. Vsanborn (talk) 12:21, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
Another fine mess
editThough not as bad as William Beldham. Needs revision and expansion. Some of the tales in the article are anecdotal and I don't think they can be verified. Where does the eight centuries at Lord's come from? --BlackJack | talk page 06:11, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
- Have made a start by removing some stuff and giving it a fresh layout. Content needs to be addressed very carefully. --Jack | talk page 07:02, 13 July 2009 (UTC)