Talk:Loredana Lecciso

Latest comment: 14 years ago by 93.32.219.121 in topic removing deletion template, explanation

Unspecified source for Image:78 m.jpg

edit

I found Image:78 m.jpg and noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. Someone will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If it was obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If there are other files on this page, consider checking that they have specified their source and are tagged properly, too. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 04:18, 26 May 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

Betacommand (talkcontribsBot) 04:18, 26 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:78 m.jpg

edit
 

Image:78 m.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand (talkcontribsBot) 04:18, 26 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

removing deletion template, explanation

edit

A stand alone article about her is present in the most important italian paper encyclopedia about television (Garzantina della televisione, third edition), and this is already present in her voice as a source (Enciclopedia della televisione (terza edizione), page 414, Garzanti Editore). Many book [1] and newspaper talk of her many television apparences during the first year of the XXI century as a cultural phenomenon. For the previous reasons she is notable for Wikipedia:Notability_(people)#Basic_criteria (multiple, reliable, and indipendent source). In the next months (spring 2010) she will be one of the contestant of the italian version of Celebrity Survivor, so her notability can at worst increase, and not diminish.

In it.wiki was proposed for deletion 5 times it:Discussione:Loredana_Lecciso, but always not deleted, 3 time with also a clear consensus to maintain the article. Moreover, as you can read with an online translator, many of the pro-deletion comments in the italian deletion talk here in en.wiki will be classified under Wikipedia:I just don't like it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.32.219.121 (talk) 19:11, 14 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

marriage?

edit

i don't know who wrote this, but, actually she is not married, so i removed that part