 | This article was nominated for deletion on 16 July 2018. The result of the discussion was keep. |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Neutrality
editThe mainstream reception of Cordain's views needs to be included. Alexbrn talk|contribs|COI 16:10, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
I am confused, Alexbrn reverted a note about reception and rebuttal of Cordain's work after asking (here) for mainstream views. It has been a long time since I edited pages but I don't understand the issue here. And, I get that that itself might be the issue. ;-) Paleomaan (talk) 00:33, 19 August 2016 (UTC)
- Sourcing needs to be strong and presented neutrally - there's some reasonable content that could be adapted from the paleo diet article here. This article has a lot pf problems - mainly unreliable sourcing and WP:COATRACKing about the diet. Alexbrn (talk) 05:40, 19 August 2016 (UTC)