Talk:Lorenzo Magalotti
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
editHallo Attilios, the article looks very boring now, many thanks for your other edits. What is wrong with pictures of science and of places MAGALOTTI has been. Your lay-out is ugly. Taksen (talk) 03:12, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
Output of automatic peer reviewer script
editThe following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.
- You may wish to consider adding an appropriate infobox for this article, if one exists relating to the topic of the article. [?] (Note that there might not be an applicable infobox; remember that these suggestions are not generated manually)
- Watch for redundancies that make the article too wordy instead of being crisp and concise. (You may wish to try Tony1's redundancy exercises.)
- Vague terms of size often are unnecessary and redundant - “some”, “a variety/number/majority of”, “several”, “a few”, “many”, “any”, and “all”. For example, “
Allpigs are pink, so we thought ofa number ofways to turn them green.” - “In
the year [of]1674”
- Vague terms of size often are unnecessary and redundant - “some”, “a variety/number/majority of”, “several”, “a few”, “many”, “any”, and “all”. For example, “
- The article will need references. See WP:CITE and WP:V for more information.[?]
- Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a.[?]
You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, Wim van Dorst (talk) 20:52, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Lorenzo Magalotti. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110927171421/http://www.mcah.columbia.edu/arthum/images/1200/rembrandt/0071_3301_3567_023.jpg to http://www.mcah.columbia.edu/arthum/images/1200/rembrandt/0071_3301_3567_023.jpg
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110719172504/http://www.euchems.org/binaries/32_Burns_tcm23-139377.pdf to http://www.euchems.org/binaries/32_Burns_tcm23-139377.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:35, 6 January 2018 (UTC)