Talk:Loring Air Force Base/GA2
Latest comment: 10 years ago by Ktr101 in topic GA Review
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Peacemaker67 (talk · contribs) 00:44, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
Rate | Attribute | Review Comment |
---|---|---|
1. Well-written: | ||
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. |
Second half of the Cold War
UFO sighting
BRAC 1991 and closure
Accidents and incidents
Base culture and civilian life - this section reads a bit like a tourism ad
Current Status
| |
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. | ||
2. Verifiable with no original research: | ||
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. |
| |
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). |
| |
2c. it contains no original research. | None that I can see, source spotchecks were all ok | |
3. Broad in its coverage: | ||
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. | Definitely covers the main aspects of the topic | |
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). | It is quite a big article, with about 7.5K words. Towards the top end of readability on such a subject, but acceptable | |
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. | No detectablebias | |
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. | No edit-warring or recent major content changes | |
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: | ||
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. | virtually all PD US Govt, the others are also ok | |
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. | all images are relevant and captions are fine | |
7. Overall assessment. |
- Comment. Copyedited down to Second half of the Cold War - Dank (push to talk) 01:47, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
- Comment I can't find another source for [place.mar.cx/places/us/me/loring_afb_census_designated_place/ this link], as it's the only source for the 1970 census that I can find, and it's also unreliable. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 03:06, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
- Comment Peacemaker67, I have completed all of it. The only thing I didn't address was the "Security Option 3" issue, since I couldn't find it anywhere (even the NRO page has no explanation), and fixing the DFAS link to something else. I think I covered it all, so let me know if you want anything else changed. Also, would you be able to fix the footnotes thing, as I am unsure of how to fix it without breaking everything. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 00:55, 2 October 2014 (UTC)