Talk:Los Angeles River bicycle path

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cycling, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cycling on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CyclingWikipedia:WikiProject CyclingTemplate:WikiProject Cyclingcycling articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

California

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Merge Los Angeles River Bikeway into this article?

Latest comment: 8 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

From what I can tell, "LARIO" is just a local name for the combination of the lower, east-side-of-river section of the subject of this article, and the Rio Hondo bicycle path... correct me if I'm wrong. --Junkyardsparkle (talk) 21:01, 8 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Oppose, for now: It seems the Los Angeles River Bicycle Path is a name used for the entire 51 mile planned LA River route from Long Beach to Canoga Park, with current completed pedestrian/bicycle path sections having asphalt or DG (decomposed granite) pavement. It seems the Los Angeles River Bikeway/LARIO is a name used for only the lower river section from Long Beach to Vernon, which is an asphalt paved "Class 1" bikeway. The east-side-of-river section connection to the Rio Hondo bicycle path seems to not be distinguished by a name. Then the city of LA seems to also use the name "Los Angeles River Greenway" for the entire river's planned continuous walk/bike routes. My use of "it seems" & "oppose, for now" here stems from current online research results, which lack a sole agency/organization definitively defining/distinguishing them. I may be wrong. — Look2See1 t a l k → 07:28, 15 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

OK, I'll go ahead and remove the merge tags. Thanks for the recent work on the article! --Junkyardsparkle (talk) 07:51, 15 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Los Angeles River bicycle path. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:24, 6 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Add topic