Talk:Lost and Found (Mudvayne album)

Other Lost and Founds

Lost and Found is an extremely common title for books and music albums alike. Why this article should be dedicated to Mudvayne is mind-boggling. This wasn't even the only popular music album to carry this title in 2005, let alone over all time.

That's what the disambiguation page is for. Of course there are other Lost and Founds, but each article should be dedicated to a specific one.--BennyD 02:49, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

The following is a closed discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was all 3 moved, per uncontroversial (and rational) request. -Patstuart^talk|edits 01:54, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

Requested move #1 (Mudvayne album)

Lost and Found → Lost and Found (Mudvayne album) — There are many uses of the term "Lost and Found", and I see no evidence that this album is more notable than the others listed at Lost and Found (disambiguation). That disambiguation page could then be moved to Lost and Found. Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 09:15, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

Survey

Add  # '''Support'''  or  # '''Oppose'''  on a new line in the appropriate section followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion using ~~~~.

Survey - Support votes

1. Support per nomination, but see also my comment below. PC78 11:46, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
   • Comment, looking at it again I can see that there is also an article at Lost and found, which would seem to be the primary topic for this term. I still support moving Lost and Found, but maybe it's best to leave the dab page where it is. PC78 14:00, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
2. Strong support per nom - but redirect to Lost and found. 146.186.210.78 20:34, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
3. Support, and make Lost & Found, Lost and found, etc, all redir back to a single disambig page.--AtD 14:55, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
4. Support. I've dealt with some of these articles in the past, and they're a real tangle. I agree with moving the existing articles at "Lost And Found," "Lost & Found," and "Lost and Found" to disambiguated names, and then redirect all those alternate spellings to a single disambiguation page. --Elonka 23:04, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

Survey - Oppose votes

Discussion

Add any additional comments:

• There's also Lost And Found and Lost & Found, both of which contain articles, but should probably be redirects to the dab page. PC78 11:44, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Good point; I've added them to the move request, and changed my mind about moving the disambiguation page, per your comment above. —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 21:50, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

Requested move #2 (Will Smith album)

Lost & Found → Lost and Found (Will Smith album) — This album is also called "Lost and Found" (not "Lost & Found"), and should be disambiguated like other albums with this title. Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 21:50, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

Survey

Add  # '''Support'''  or  # '''Oppose'''  on a new line in the appropriate section followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion using ~~~~.

Survey - Support votes

• Support, per nomination. PC78 23:29, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
• Support per nom. -Patstuart^talk|edits 18:05, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
• Support per my above comments. I also agree with getting rid of the ampersand character. --Elonka 23:04, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

Survey - Oppose votes

Discussion

Add any additional comments:

Requested move #3 (Christian rock band)

Lost And Found → Lost and Found (Christian rock band) — This band apparently capitalizes the word "and" in their name, but I don't think that's a sufficient distinction for article naming. Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 21:50, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

Survey

Add  # '''Support'''  or  # '''Oppose'''  on a new line in the appropriate section followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion using ~~~~.

Survey - Support votes

• Support, per nomination. PC78 23:29, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
• Support per nom. -Patstuart^talk|edits 18:06, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
• Support per my above comments. I'd prefer lowercasing the "and" though, and moving to Lost and Found (Christian rock band). I also have strong concerns about the band's notability, especially considering the article's lack of reliable sources. If other sources can be found, then the article's title should reflect the most commonly-used spelling of the band's name, as it appears in those third-party sources. --Elonka 23:04, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

Survey - Oppose votes

Discussion

Add any additional comments:

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Fair use rationale for Image:LostAndFound.JPG

Image:LostAndFound.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:40, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Mudvayne lost and found.jpg

Image:Mudvayne lost and found.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 01:45, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

Unreliable source?

One of the sources used is "sea of tranquility". I'm not sure if this source is reliable, it looks like some sort of amateur webzine. Can anyone confirm this? I call the big one bitey 06:56, 10 March 2013 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion going on the talk page about the use of this website. You can read it here. Andrzejbanas (talk) 14:50, 12 September 2014 (UTC)

Genre

Before adding genres to this article, we need to find reliable sources for it. Can we find some discussing this album in particular? Andrzejbanas (talk) 14:50, 12 September 2014 (UTC)

It's pretty clear that this album is progressive metal. Why fight the sources? --68.185.2.134 (talk) 20:52, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

What sources? Binksternet (talk) 02:18, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

Sputnikmusic

Non-professional reviewer. Not a reliable source. --68.185.2.34 (talk) 17:47, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

Yes, this much is correct. However, the edit you're talking about removed about 5 other sources as well, including many reliable ones. Please be more careful in your editing in the future. You should not removed all of these. Sergecross73 msg me 18:12, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Lost and Found (Mudvayne album). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151117030057/https://jam.canoe.com/Music/Artists/M/Mudvayne/AlbumReviews/2005/04/28/1016981.html to https://jam.canoe.com/Music/Artists/M/Mudvayne/AlbumReviews/2005/04/28/1016981.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100907052837/http://www.vh1.com/news/articles/1497672/03022005/mudvayne.jhtml to http://www.vh1.com/news/articles/1497672/03022005/mudvayne.jhtml
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140109180037/http://www.ultimate-guitar.com/news/online_downloads/mudvayne_fall_into_sleep_video_online.html to http://www.ultimate-guitar.com/news/online_downloads/mudvayne_fall_into_sleep_video_online.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:08, 30 June 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Lost and Found (Mudvayne album). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150904024728/http://www.riaa.com/goldandplatinumdata.php to http://riaa.com/goldandplatinumdata.php?&artist=mudvayne
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080129151648/http://mixonline.com/news/audio_dave_fortman_produce/ to http://mixonline.com/news/audio_dave_fortman_produce/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090521211654/http://music.ign.com/articles/606/606036p1.html to http://music.ign.com/articles/606/606036p1.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:36, 24 December 2017 (UTC)