Talk:Lost frog

My thoughts

Two things in particular about this article, I have just done a clean up of it. There was a problem with POV, so if I deleted any section, it was generally due to this. I do agree to the POV, but it has no place in Wikipedia. If I deleted information which is neccesary (which I probably did, sorry), you should re-add it, just rephrase it to make it less POV. Secondly, I didn't edit the quarantine section, there is some POV there, but I cannot remedy it without spending some time on research. Mostly, I think hygiene protocol should be mentioned. The only one I am aware of is the NSW NPWS Hygeine Protocol, but I am sure the other states would have an equivalent.

The second thing, was the name of the article. The use of all capitals is only used once in the opening sentence, and is never used again. I think the article should be moved to "Lost frogs" (without the capital on "frogs"). Thanks --liquidGhoul 12:59, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

I moved the page to Lost frog and I added a sentence on the Hygiene Protocol, as well as a link to it. I think I could probably expand on it a bit more, but I'm not to sure what else to write. Thanks for the POV clean up.--Tnarg 12345 22:54, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

What about the problems Lost frogs cause when they go unnoticed?

Is this a problem that should go on the article? I was thinking about what happens if a person hinds a lost frog and just releases it into their neighborhood? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bobthe13th (talk • contribs) 20:15, 19 September 2012 (UTC)

"Lost frog" term

The lost frog term is not widely used. It is used mainly in Australia and mentioned in some campaigns. There is already book published where it is use this term to describe frogs which were disappeared and found later (in the same place).

Requesting to add following statement: So far, the lost frogs term is used only in Australia by animal rights activists. Ferakp (talk) 16:55, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Lost frog. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060819002441/http://fats.org.au/activities/rescue.html to http://www.fats.org.au/activities/rescue.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060428195316/http://www.nationalparks.nsw.gov.au/PDFs/hyprfrog.pdf to http://www.nationalparks.nsw.gov.au/pdfs/hyprfrog.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:03, 6 January 2018 (UTC)