Talk:Loudoun v. Board of Trustees of the Loudoun County Library
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Loudoun v. Board of Trustees of the Loudoun County Library. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090304155159/http://www.abanet.org/publiced/lawday/schools/lessons/handout_internetlegal.html to http://www.abanet.org/publiced/lawday/schools/lessons/handout_internetlegal.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:34, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
Sole sentence ungrammatical
editThe entire body of this one-sentence stub goes as follows: "Loudoun v. Board of Trustees of the Loudoun County Library, 24 F. Supp. 2d 552 (E.D. Va. 1998), was a U.S. district court held that a county policy requiring filters on all of its public library Internet computers was an unconstitutional restriction of free speech."
The source sentence at reference 1, http://www.abanet.org/publiced/lawday/schools/lessons/handout_internetlegal.html goes as follows: "Loudoun v. Board of Trustees of the Loudoun County Library (1998). A U.S. district court held that a county policy requiring filters on all of its public library Internet computers was an unconstitutional restriction of free speech."
I am going to ignore the WP:INTEXT question and just change it enough to make it grammatical. Dgndenver (talk) 09:31, 7 August 2023 (UTC)