This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
I am not keen to have valid content removed, pending an editor identifying "issues" not explained. I restored a revised list to the article. Buildings mentioned in the text narration are indeed also mentioned in the revised list. I think that is fine. There was previously two mentions of Joplin Union Depot; is that the "issue" referred to? Please explain that and any other "issues". --doncram04:33, 28 November 2011 (UTC)Reply
Having two or three references to everything in the list is indeed the issue I was referring to. Dumping information into an article without regard for what's already there is A Really Bad Idea. --SarekOfVulcan (talk)04:39, 28 November 2011 (UTC)Reply
I see your writing but I still don't get what issue you refer to. The main text of the article can mention buildings that are included in a bigger list of notable works. "Having two or three references" is good. You want to remove references? I don't view your removal of the revised version of the list as improving the article. It hurts the article. For example, your removal of Louis Curtiss Studio Building hurts the article; it is worth mentioning that the architect's studio exists and is NRHP-listed. Are you opposed to that?
Also, do you have specific intention to build a table of works or somehow otherwise develop this? I would be willing to defer if you are actually asserting that you are using the information that I have identified. If you are not going to develop this, or clarify specific issues in an actionable way, it is reasonable to restore the further development of the works of this architect. --doncram04:50, 28 November 2011 (UTC)Reply