Talk:Louis Moinet

Untitled

Please note that this text was copied from http://www.watches-lexic.ch/pages/eng/gal/moinet.htm - there is no copyright message on the web page so we believe it to be in the public domain.

One more thing to add...the original source for the text is Pantheon Universal Biography which was published in Paris 1853, well before public domain date of 1923. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Michael64 (talk • contribs) 16:48, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Louis Moinet. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130325101338/http://www.monochrome.nl:80/louis-moinet-unveils-the-worlds-first-chronograph-dating-back-to-1816/ to http://www.monochrome.nl/louis-moinet-unveils-the-worlds-first-chronograph-dating-back-to-1816/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:32, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

This article is rife with speculation, is manifestly partial, and appears to be an advertisement

There are a great many claims without attribution in this article and it does its best to prop up the reputation of a somewhat obscure figure whose name has been applied to a modern watch brand in hopes of bolstering sales and who is best known for stealing from his former employer. It is in need of a thorough revision to reflect proper standards for an encyclopedia article and for factual accuracy free from the prejudices of those who seek to profit from a more favorable view of this questionable man. 109.253.209.152 (talk) 20:12, 6 November 2023 (UTC)