Talk:Louisi-animal

Its not illegal.--Topspinslams (talk) 04:19, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

Discussion from User_talk:Mdbrownmsw & User_talk:Topspinslams

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Louisi-animal, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Louisi-animal. Mdbrownmsw (talk) 03:56, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

Do you think the source is enough to remove the tag? --Topspinslams (talk) 04:07, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

OK, now it's refferenced, but that creates new problems... Mdbrownmsw (talk) 04:19, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

What else should be done, and btw it's not illegal. --Topspinslams (talk) 04:20, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

(above copied from User_talk:Mdbrownmsw & User_talk:Topspinslams.)

"What else should be done,"

• I don't know that there's really much that should be done. I don't see anything notable here.

"and btw it's not illegal."

• "Like most mixtapes this one can’t legally be sold or given away;"Louisi-animal#_note-NY_Times

Mdbrownmsw (talk) 13:47, 10 December 2007 (UTC)