Talk:Louisiana Lottery Corporation
Latest comment: 2 years ago by PrimeBOT in topic Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
edit
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): CamdenAl.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 02:54, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Requested move 13 October 2014
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: no consensus to move either article to the plain title at this time, per the discussion below. Dekimasuよ! 23:50, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
Louisiana Lottery Corporation → Louisiana Lottery – On Wikipedia, all other U.S. lotteries follow the naming convention <state name>_Lottery --Relisted. George Ho (talk) 03:10, 21 October 2014 (UTC) – Kgibbe1 (talk) 19:12, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
- This is a contested technical request (permalink). Anthony Appleyard (talk) 21:25, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
- Louisiana Lottery is a disambig page. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 21:25, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
- It could be replaced with a hatnote on this article, instead (WP:TWODABS). That looks like it would make sense to me. —innotata 23:53, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
- Comment isn't the primary and more educational topic, the other topic, the 19th century corporation? -- 67.70.35.44 (talk) 21:17, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
- I'm not sure why that would be. Older does not equal more important or scholarly, and it doesn't seem as though the prominence of the lottery is somehow much less now than it was then.--Yaksar (let's chat) 01:21, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
- Well, this article is (1) unreferenced (2) has no major events attached to it. The 19th century one has several scandals attached to it, and was the only major lottery in the United States to exist in its period. So, from surface appearances, this modern corporation is nothing more than an average lottery corporation, while the other one has significant events and characteristics attached to it. -- 67.70.35.44 (talk) 02:28, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
- I'm not sure why that would be. Older does not equal more important or scholarly, and it doesn't seem as though the prominence of the lottery is somehow much less now than it was then.--Yaksar (let's chat) 01:21, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
- Comment isn't the primary and more educational topic, the other topic, the 19th century corporation? -- 67.70.35.44 (talk) 21:17, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
- It could be replaced with a hatnote on this article, instead (WP:TWODABS). That looks like it would make sense to me. —innotata 23:53, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.