Talk:Louisiana Purchase Sesquicentennial half dollar
Latest comment: 4 years ago by Wehwalt in topic is this right?
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Louisiana Purchase Sesquicentennial half dollar article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Louisiana Purchase Sesquicentennial half dollar is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so. | ||||||||||
This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on September 26, 2019. | ||||||||||
|
This article is rated FA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion
editThe following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 01:36, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
is this right?
editHello User:Wehwalt, "... who had failed to get any action on his bill during the 88th Congress but who planned to try again in January 1953"
But 88th United States Congress "...from January 3, 1963, to January 3, 1965..."
Right?--Jarodalien (talk) 11:22, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
- It should have read 82nd. Can't imagine how I pulled that one.--Wehwalt (talk) 12:18, 11 May 2020 (UTC)