Talk:Love Minus Zero/No Limit/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 20:10, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Disambiguations: none found. Jezhotwells (talk) 20:11, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

Linkrot: none found. Jezhotwells (talk) 20:11, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

Checking against GA criteria

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   Prose read well, complies with MoS

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   There is a problem with ref #17 [1]. This returns a null search page. Better to stick with ref#5 which returns the full list of versions by Dylan and others. Y

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   None used

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   OK, if the ref problem above can be fixed this will pass. On hold for seven days. Jezhotwells (talk) 20:28, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

   Cool, thanks for fixing that, I tried but couldn't. I am happy to promote this. Congratulations! Jezhotwells (talk) 03:26, 26 September 2010 (UTC)

• Thank you for the review. I fixed the link. It is actually the same webpage that could be accessed from ref #5, but this link gets to the covers directly. Rlendog (talk) 03:15, 26 September 2010 (UTC)