This article is within the scope of WikiProject British and Irish hills, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the hills and mountains of Great Britain and Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.British and Irish hillsWikipedia:WikiProject British and Irish hillsTemplate:WikiProject British and Irish hillsBritish and Irish hills articles
Lovely Seat is within the scope of WikiProject Yorkshire, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Yorkshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project's talk page.YorkshireWikipedia:WikiProject YorkshireTemplate:WikiProject YorkshireYorkshire articles
Latest comment: 14 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion
Perhaps we should start a new category "Doubtful Marilyns". Anybody got any up to date info on whether Lovely Seat still qualifies. I think I read somewhere that any borderline hills had been accepted into the Marilyn list to avoid any controversial exclusions. Mick Knapton10:16, 19 May 2006 (UTC)Reply
Don't know about that: If it's on the list then it's in. Worth commenting on the dubious nature though, as has been done. Grinner13:54, 22 May 2006 (UTC)Reply
Lovely Seat was re-surveyed in May and found to have a re-ascent of only 149.1m. It's been removed from the list of Marilyns. Richard B (talk) 00:06, 24 June 2010 (UTC)Reply
