Talk:Low power

Untitled

Well, I'm going to go ahead and start rewriting. But I'd like people to take a look at Low-power broadcasting. Perhaps we need a little more of the philosophical discussion here to move there. Then a page like Low power electronics could contain a complete discussion about low power consumption devices(?)... -Crenner 02:47, 6 January 2006 (UTC)

Ok, at this point, I'm convinced that this contents of this page should be split, with only the first, definition section left here. Move the philosophy of low-power broadcasting to either Low-power broadcasting or Low-power communication device, and start a new page for low power consumption devices. What should it be called? Where should broadcast stuff go? - Crenner 03:06, 6 January 2006 (UTC)

Agree on the moving of the broadcasting stuff. I'd go with Low-power broadcasting for that. For the low power consumption devices... Low-power electronics sounds reasonable to me --Alynna 04:33, 6 January 2006 (UTC)

2006-11-9: The Cartoon Guide... link is dead. Removing it. The low-power IC part needs more coverage in a separate article, I'll expand it later. -Phil

2006-11-13: I expanded the low power part a little. I'll help re-write it and add sources in the future. I agree with Alynna on the names for seperate articles. -Phil

Fixing dead URL

The link to the paper "Loop Accelerator for ..." is dead. I am fixing the link to point to the new location. While I did not add the original link, I am the author of that paper. So conflict of interest cops such as Mr. Calltrace be fore warned. Just found the dead link while searching for stuff and decided to help.

Old link: http://www.stanford.edu/~mbinu/pubs/loopaccel.pdf New link: http://www.siliconintelligence.com/people/binu/pubs/loopaccel.pdf —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 155.98.92.141 (talk) 03:59, 28 December 2006 (UTC).