Talk:Lower Germanic Limes
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Lower Germanic Limes article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article was edited to contain a total or partial translation of Niedergermanischer Limes from the German Wikipedia. Consult the history of the original page to see a list of its authors. (This notice applies to version 728002027 and subsequent versions of this page.) |
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Lower Germanic Limes. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100416035123/http://www.romanaqueducts.info/webteksten/romeineninnederland.html to http://www.romanaqueducts.info/webteksten/romeineninnederland.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:24, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
New images of the Limes in the Netherlands on Wikimedia Commons
edit(Apologies for posting this in English)
Dear all,
The Erfgoedhuis Zuid-Holland, a Dutch heritage organisation, made some 200 images on the Dutch part of the Limes available on Wikimedia Commons. The images depict Roman re-enactment scenes, artifacts, and some digital reconstructions of Roman buildings. A subset of this collection comes from the image library of the Dutch National Antiquities Museum, which recently made its images available under a CC-BY license. The entire collection on Wikimedia Commons can be accessed here, the sub-collection from the antiquities museum can be found here.
Regards, AWossink (talk) 11:37, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
Somewhat strange sentence
editOne of the first sentences of the article strikes me as somewhat strange. I admit that I am not a native speaker of English, but I think I can still say this. This is sentence in question: "The Lower Germanic Limes separated that part of the Rhineland left of the Rhine as well as the Netherlands, which was part of the Roman Empire, from the less tightly controlled regions east of the Rhine." Now in my opinion this can be wrongfully read as if the whole of the present day Netherlands were part of the Roman Empire. This is clearly not the case (see the map). I would suggest to reformulate as follow: "The Lower Germanic Limes separated that part of the Rhineland and the Netherlands left of the Rhine, which was part of the Roman Empire, from the less tightly controlled regions east and north of the Rhine."
2A02:A03F:668F:8E00:527:8387:A97:DD41 (talk) 08:40, 26 July 2022 (UTC)