Talk:Loy Yang Power Station

Recommend split

They may share the name, but Loy Yang A and B Power Stations are just geographically adjacent projects, nothing more. I recommend that we split this into two separate articles, A and B. Would make InfoBoxes simpler among other benefits.--Graham Proud (talk) 11:59, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

I don't think that a split is a good idea. It is quite common that a plant is extended and that the extention is technically independent from the first development step. There may be even different operators. But in this case they use the same fuel source / same mine, and other shared infrastructure. This means there will be quite a lot of redundancy if two articles on A and B are written. --Gunnar (talk) 12:24, 29 August 2020 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Loy Yang Power Station. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050306033948/http://www.loyyangpower.com.au/ to http://www.loyyangpower.com.au/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:24, 7 January 2018 (UTC)

Horse power

I find it a little bit weird to give the electric power of a power plant in horse power. Due to historical reasons, that was the commonly used unit for the engine power of cars, but even this shifts to kW since the 1980s. In electrical power engineering, nobody did use horse power and I find it rather confusing to have a number with so many zeros, whereas the usual unit size is a few hundred MW. --Gunnar (talk) 12:31, 29 August 2020 (UTC)