| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Issues
editThere are no good references that show notability. The article is stuffed full of non-encyclopaedic content, including what appears to be a list of every work and every publication by this artist. Needs very severe pruning and some good reputable references from the real world to survive here. Potential nominee for deletion unless much improved. Velella Velella Talk 13:08, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
@Valella: Thank you for your message. Some more references have been added: can you confirm me that they can be considered as reputable refereces? Most of the sources are art magazines. Thank you Manumanumanuela (talk) 14:00, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
- I would be happy to review the article prior to any deletion discussion that I might initiate, but only if and when, you feel that all the points noted above have been addressed - the article is still stuffed full of non-encyclopaedic material. Regards Velella Velella Talk 14:10, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
- As the article stands now it is a strong candidate for deletion. Full of non-encyclopaedic material particularly wikipedia is not meant to be a CV. If you trim out the poorly written descriptions there is little that speaks to notability.Peter Rehse (talk) 20:35, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
- The whole entry is a copy paste from the main and sub pages of http://www.lucapozzi.com/.Peter Rehse (talk) 16:04, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
- As the article stands now it is a strong candidate for deletion. Full of non-encyclopaedic material particularly wikipedia is not meant to be a CV. If you trim out the poorly written descriptions there is little that speaks to notability.Peter Rehse (talk) 20:35, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
- Since the author seemed to be unwilling or unable to amend this article, I have removed all that extraneous material. I believe that notability is possible to demonstrate (q.v the New Scientist" reference) but much work is still needed. Velella Velella Talk 13:06, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
Contested deletion
editThis page should not be speedy deleted as an unambiguous copyright infringement, because... (I am the author of the uploaded images) --Lucapozzilp (talk) 12:25, 25 July 2015 (UTC)