Talk:LucasArts adventure games

Latest comment: 10 months ago by LaukkuTheGreit in topic Sources for influence?
edit

The image Image:LucasArts GoldGuy logo purple.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
  • That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --08:55, 19 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Article expansion

edit

I've just uploaded a fairly large expansion of this article, the objective of which is to turn this into a proper portal to all the adventure game articles. This has been sitting in my sandbox for quite a while, I figured it would be more productive at this point to stick it out here and work on it in mainspace over time. I've included basic summaries of each game; whilst unreferenced at present, they are adapted from their respective articles' contents and I'll be referencing them in due course. There's also more details on the cancelled games and the descendent companies. There's still a few sections I'd like to construct; firstly, an opening overview section before the actual games dealing with the common themes of writing, design and audio production - basically defining what these games are - and secondly, a critical appraisal of these games as a whole, to be put in a "cultural impact" section along with the descendent companies. I'm still looking for sources for these, which is why these sections aren't included at present. -- Sabre (talk) 13:51, 4 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Budgets

edit

Monkey Island 1: $135,000 [1]
Day of the Tentacle: $600,000
Full Throttle: $1,500,000
Grim Fandango: $3,000,000 [2] [3] [4] [5] --Mika1h (talk) 19:06, 10 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on LucasArts adventure games. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:31, 27 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on LucasArts adventure games. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:25, 8 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Source

edit

Could we add a Critical Reception table?

edit

Would be handy for this 'Golden Age' type article to have a table listing the critical reception to each game, to highlight te accalim these games received at this time, and perhaps any outliers.--Coin945 (talk) 21:39, 7 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Sources for influence?

edit

A common understanding is that LucasArts was a major reason for adventure games in general shifting from the Sierra-era design of allowing dead ends and sudden deaths into a "fairer" paradigm, but I've had some trouble finding sources confirming this. From an evening's Googling I found this IGN article which briefly states: "The no-death or dead-end rule that The Secret of Monkey Island introduced to the genre quickly became the norm." However I wonder whether that's too vaguely worded to be usable (The "norm" in what?).--LaukkuTheGreit (TalkContribs) 17:07, 11 January 2024 (UTC)Reply