Talk:Lucca Ashtear/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Tintor2 (talk · contribs) 22:45, 27 September 2019 (UTC)

I will be taking this article since I think it meets the requirements needed to become a GA but I'll do the review during this weekend.Tintor2 (talk) 22:45, 27 September 2019 (UTC)

Some stuff that might be better suited: Lead and Infobox'

• The infobox lacks an alt.
  • Fixed, though an alt is only required for FAC (not a bad suggestion though)
• Curious about it. Did Square never mention the characters' creator? Maybe Masato Katō?
  • I tried to find details on who made the characters, but apparently multiple people were responsible for different characters and it doesn't specify who was responsible for Lucca.
• I did a bit of check up in the infobox to focus where she was introduced
  • I'm not sure what you mean?
• Doesn't the second paragraph lack a mention about her creation? A small sentence would be enough. Maybe you could tone down the reception area from paragraph to balance it.
  • Added an extra detail on creation to the first paragraph.

Concept and creation

• "ile Lucca uses magic, she also often uses weaponry, such as a hammer, gun, flamethrower, and bombs." Sounds a bit trivial unless the creators wanted to highlight this.
  • Removed
• "swing that way." If that was in the Japanese version, then it might be better to paraphrase unless a writer mentions it.
  • The translation of the text to "swing that way" comes from the source attached.

Appearances

• Not necessary but gamefaqs has the entire game script. It might be useful to cite everything.
  • GameFAQs is not considered a reliable source as it were; however, it should be noted that beyond sourcing to verify that she did actually appear in the games being discussed, that the other text need not be sourced.
• Same with Quest
  • Above

Reception

• "Lucca's depression by Robo" this could be expanded a bit.
  • I moved that part to the section on the accident so that it is given greater context.
• The merchandise section is a bit small. I would merge it with the reception.
  • I moved this to the Appearances section, as someone informed me that it would work better there.

The rest is everything good. Nice work with the article @Abryn:. Just check those issues and I'll gladly pass it. Cheers.Tintor2 (talk) 13:58, 28 September 2019 (UTC)

@Tintor2: Issues have been addressed or responded to, let me know if they satisfy you. - Bryn (talk) (contributions) 19:58, 28 September 2019 (UTC)

@Abryn: I meant placing the cite quote and then using the ones from gamefaqs to cite the game itself. Still, good work with the article. Congratulations.Tintor2 (talk) 21:52, 28 September 2019 (UTC)