This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Latest comment: 14 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion
Despite the recent conversation at the G&R project, I've moved this and a couple of related articles back to their old names. My reasons:
Many articles link to the original name. When I created the article, I meticulously searched for links to this man and made sure they were correct, and added links if they had been missing; if an editor doesn't care to do the same, why should that editor be making the decision on naming?
This Lucius Valerius Flaccus is easily confused with his cousin and son and various others, and I gave a lot of thought as to how best to distinguish them.
He's not the only LVF to be a consul (the 'suffect' may be meaningless to some people).
The year is the best way to help users pinpoint which man they're looking for.
Sorry, to clarify: the main potential for confusing these two men lies in the fact that they were both highly active and highly visible in 86 BC; that's why the year is the crucial point of distinction. Cynwolfe (talk) 15:53, 27 January 2010 (UTC)Reply