Talk:Luidia ciliaris

A fact from Luidia ciliaris appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 6 September 2011 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the seven armed starfish (pictured) can "walk" and does not have an anus?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2011/September. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Luidia ciliaris.

Wikipedia

Animals Low‑importance

Luidia ciliaris is within the scope of WikiProject Animals, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to animals and zoology. For more information, visit the project page.AnimalsWikipedia:WikiProject AnimalsTemplate:WikiProject Animalsanimal articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Animals To-do:

Here are some Open Tasks :

Copyedit:
Merge: GLAM/ARKive donated texts into articles about endangered species.
Improve: Photoperiodism, Tool use by non-human animals, Omnivore, Animal suicide, Sphaerium beckmani (a species in family Sphaeriidae),
Requests:
- Mammals:
- Invertebrates: Campocraspedon
- Fishes: Zaniolepis frenata
Merge: GLAM/ARKive donated texts into articles about endangered species.
Expand: Junqueira cow, Atka mackerel
Nominate and vote: Science collaboration of the month, Article Improvement Drive, WikiProject Animals Collaboration

Marine life (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Marine life, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Marine lifeWikipedia:WikiProject Marine lifeTemplate:WikiProject Marine lifeMarine life articles

Is that starfish in the new image actually L. ciliaris?

Latest comment: 10 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

An image has just been added in the body of the article. The species seems to be of very variable appearance... Is there a reliable identification for this specimen? Chiswick Chap (talk) 06:05, 29 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

I also wondered about this. Ras Sedr is on the Gulf of Suez and not in the stated range of this starfish. On the other hand the original image, taken off the coast of Spain and therefore within the species' range, might be incorrectly identified. The fact that a starfish has 7 arms is inconclusive because many species have a variable number of arms. The colouring of the new image seems wrong and this source has an image that more resembles our original one. Perhaps we should ask an expert. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 08:56, 29 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

I think we should. Probably there's an echinoderm forum somewhere. Chiswick Chap (talk) 12:16, 29 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Add topic