Talk:Luis Ibáñez/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 01:50, 24 February 2011 (UTC)

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status. I expect to post a full review within two days and will notify the nominator then. Jezhotwells (talk) 01:50, 24 February 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguations: none found

Linkrot: none found. Jezhotwells (talk) 01:51, 24 February 2011 (UTC)

Checking against GA criteria

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   The article is very poorly written, needs a thorough copy-edit throughout. You may be able to enlist help from the WP:Guild of copyeditors. Currently this is a long way away from meeting critirion #1 of the WP:GACR.

   The lead does not fully summarise the article, see WP:LEAD

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   Sources appear reliable and back up statements, although I have to assume good faith as I only relying on machine translations.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   Broad and focussed

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

   NPOV

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

   No edit warring

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   Licensed and captioned

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   ON hold for seven days for copy-editing. Jezhotwells (talk) 16:46, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

   Well there have been a few minor edits but nothing resembling a full copy-edit and no response from the nominator, so I will not be listing this at this time. When it has been copy-edited, take it to WP:Peer review and when any points from that have been addressed, re-nominate at WP:GAN. Please check the WP:GACR and make sure that any future nominations meet all of the criteria. Jezhotwells (talk) 11:50, 6 March 2011 (UTC)