Talk:Lujan–Fryns syndrome

Latest comment: 9 years ago by 88.104.134.144 in topic Eyes
Good articleLujan–Fryns syndrome has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
September 1, 2009Good article nomineeListed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on August 9, 2009.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Lujan-Fryns syndrome is often associated with failure of a major brain structure to develop?

expansion

edit

Needs section on treatment and epidemiology as well as a bit history regarding the condition.Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 02:52, 17 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

A population-based epidemiology for Lujan-Fryns has not been determined, currently.[1] History and treatment secs would be great, though. --Rcej (talk) 07:58, 17 August 2009 (UTC)Reply
  1. ^ Buggenhout, G. V.; Fryns, J. -P. (July 2006). "Lujan-Fryns syndrome (mental retardation, X-linked, marfanoid habitus)". Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases (Free full text). 1: 26. doi:10.1186/1750-1172-1-26. PMC 1538574. PMID 16831221.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI (link)

GA

edit

I am not convinced this is yet a GA

  1. does not fit WP:LEAD
  2. no section has been added on epidemiology. Epidemiology is not just prevalence. It is known to occur more commonly in males than female for example.
  3. Do we have permission to use the image in the lead? It is from http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=1538574

Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 02:42, 2 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

  • The journal is open access and licensed CC-BY-2.0, as noted just below the authors' affiliations and also noted on the commons image page. Thatcher 03:55, 2 September 2009 (UTC)Reply
    • Your added ref #47 was a relatively poor choice since the statement "LFS is rare" was a throwaway line in a discussion of Marfan's that cited two other references, Scwartz et al (2007) which is already cited, and Purandare and Markar (2005, PMID 16094260). (It's a good review on the psychiatric manifestations but does not address the other physical features, and also discusses XLMR in a way that is made somewhat obsolete by the MED12 finding.) The citation was also incorrect, ScienceDirect is not the source, the citation would be Lemberg and Thompson, Marfan syndrome and schizophrenia: a case report and literature review, General Hospital Psychiatry, 2009 (in press), doi:10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2009.04.010.
    • For Epidemiology it's hard to say much about a disease with only 20 or so reported cases without crossing into speculation, original research, or synthesis. You could copy-paste the entire Epidemiology section from Van Buggenhout and Fryns since it is freely licensed, but it only has 3 sentences (unknown prevalence, affects males, and there might be more cases in institutionalized populations).
    • What is missing from the lead? Thatcher 04:23, 2 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

X-linked dominant / X-linked recessive?

edit

I'm pretty sure the reference listed above says that the disease is X-linked recessive, not X-linked dominant— and I saw a pedigree in [another article] that seems to back it up. Can someone who is better at article editing/medical stuff than I check and confirm this? 63.226.248.97 (talk) 00:17, 9 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Eyes

edit

Can we have a picture with visible eyes please?--88.104.134.144 (talk) 00:22, 21 June 2015 (UTC)Reply