Talk:Luke Smith (writer)
Luke Smith (writer) has been listed as one of the Video games good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on February 18, 2009. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Luke Smith left video game journalism to work for game developer Bungie, after he had called their game Halo 2 "broken"? |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Inbound links need checking
editSome inbound links to this article may be intended for Luke Smith (The Sarah Jane Adventures), which was formerly at this title. Skomorokh, barbarian 19:21, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
Dated information
editThe last line of the article says that Luke Smith is currently working on player investment in Halo: Reach. Considering Reach has been out for over two years, and Bungie handed over control of the game to another company early 2012, I think that it is safe to say he isn't working on that anymore. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cases3 (talk • contribs) 21:04, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Luke Smith (writer). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.1up.com/do/feature?cId=3143147
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.1up.com/do/blogEntry?bId=7597162&publicUserId=5519593
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090505165511/http://kotaku.com/gaming/luke-smith/luke-smith-leaves-1up-for-bungie-gig-254153.php to http://kotaku.com/gaming/luke-smith/luke-smith-leaves-1up-for-bungie-gig-254153.php
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100217080842/http://www.bungie.net/Inside/content.aspx?link=bungiepodcasttime to http://www.bungie.net/Inside/content.aspx?link=bungiepodcasttime
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:58, 27 May 2017 (UTC)