Talk:Lula 3D/GA1
Latest comment: 13 years ago by GreatOrangePumpkin in topic GA Review
GA Review
edit| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: ♫Greatorangepumpkin♫ T 14:36, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references):
b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (references):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
I really see no issues.-- ♫Greatorangepumpkin♫ T 14:36, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
- Hey, thanks Pumpkin! Are you passing the article? Nomader (Talk) 22:45, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
- I did a second run, and I found only one mistake: "an 'erotic' adventure aimed squarely at "12 year old boys." - you forgot one quotation mark, and ref 4 redirects to another site, which can cause to a linkrot, so replace the url "http://www.computerandvideogames.com/article.php?id=134078" with "http://www.computerandvideogames.com/134078/reviews/lula-3d-review/". But the article is in my opinion ready to get the status. Regards and congratulation!-- ♫Greatorangepumpkin♫ T 17:17, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
- Grumble, I hate it when websites start to move urls around. Either way, I took care of the issues you've mentioned. Thanks again for the review, Pumpkin, and if you see anything else wrong in the article, feel free to let me know. Nomader (Talk) 19:56, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
- You asked me if I pass it? Hell, yes :D! Congratulation!-- ♫Greatorangepumpkin♫ T 13:58, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
- Grumble, I hate it when websites start to move urls around. Either way, I took care of the issues you've mentioned. Thanks again for the review, Pumpkin, and if you see anything else wrong in the article, feel free to let me know. Nomader (Talk) 19:56, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
- I did a second run, and I found only one mistake: "an 'erotic' adventure aimed squarely at "12 year old boys." - you forgot one quotation mark, and ref 4 redirects to another site, which can cause to a linkrot, so replace the url "http://www.computerandvideogames.com/article.php?id=134078" with "http://www.computerandvideogames.com/134078/reviews/lula-3d-review/". But the article is in my opinion ready to get the status. Regards and congratulation!-- ♫Greatorangepumpkin♫ T 17:17, 9 February 2011 (UTC)