floated article May 2011

edit

Note: this is an Editing for donations project, similar to Bounty Board, in that Partisan Records and Knitting Factory Records is contributing funds to the Wikimedia Foundation to prompt volunteers like me to write about this particular subject. Regardless of this donation, all Wikipedia's pillar rules still apply: neutrality, reliable sources, notability, no advertising, verifiability, balance and such. Feel free to edit this article like any other. I encourage others here to join me in the editing for donations project since it helps pay for things like computers and salaries and whatever they do (Wikimedia is a non-profit parent to Wikipedia). There's a list of still-to-be completed articles on my user page under "Partisan Records" and "Knitting Factory Records". Questions? See here. --Tomwsulcer (talk) 14:08, 17 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Too positive & promotional

edit

this article is relentlessly positive with absolutely nothing that could be regarded as critical of the band...not really balanced is it? Why is trivial fluff needed on how many hundred or so albums they press & the colour of the vinyl? I'm sure the record company/band/sponsor/donor was well pleased with such a quality looking puff piece! 94.193.14.87 (talk) 05:20, 1 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

Yes, I agree. I helped write the article years back, but I have long since dropped it from my watchlist, and lack time as well as interest to try to police it. My sense of the promotional cruft is that it detracts from the believability of the article -- that is, the extra-positive writing tone undercuts any promotional effort. So, if people feel strongly about the promotional tone, steps to take are (1) add a "promotional tone" tag at the top of the article (2) edit the article, removing the cruft. Just keep in mind that there is a learning curve towards becoming a Wikipedian. Takes time to learn about referencing, the back-and-forth of editing, how to work with others here. Good luck.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 11:39, 1 December 2014 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lumerians. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:26, 27 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lumerians. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:52, 9 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussions at the nomination pages linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 01:52, 7 March 2022 (UTC)Reply