Talk:Luminosity – Ignite the Night!

(Redirected from Talk:Luminosity — Ignite the Night!)
Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
Good articleLuminosity – Ignite the Night! has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 3, 2013Good article nomineeListed

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Luminosity — Ignite the Night!/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Dom497 (talk · contribs) 00:32, 25 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Your articles are the only ones that really interest me in the nomination list so I have been left with no choice :P .--Dom497 (talk) 00:32, 25 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:  
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:  
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. Has an appropriate reference section:  
    B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:  
    C. No original research:  
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:  
    B. Focused:  
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:  
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:  
    B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:  
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:  
    On hold for 7 days.--Dom497 (talk) 20:02, 28 March 2013 (UTC)]] On hold until April 8, 2013--Dom497 (talk) 18:24, 1 April 2013 (UTC) Pass!--Dom497 (talk) 21:04, 3 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Comments

edit
  Done-- Astros4477 (Talk) 02:29, 25 March 2013 (UTC)Reply
  • "In 2013, Cedar Point will build the show "in-house", meaning RWS will not coordinate the show.[12] Also in 2013, the show will be performed every night except Tuesday.[13]" - Probably a good idea to combine these two sentences into one.--Dom497 (talk) 00:47, 25 March 2013 (UTC)Reply
I changed the wording so 2013 wasn't repeated.-- Astros4477 (Talk) 02:29, 25 March 2013 (UTC)Reply
  Fixed-- Astros4477 (Talk) 01:35, 26 March 2013 (UTC)Reply
I'd say so because that was one of the main parts of the project.-- Astros4477 (Talk) 01:35, 26 March 2013 (UTC)Reply
What?!?! Sorry but how can making curved edges be a main part of the project? Either way it needs a source if it is to stay in the article.--Dom497 (talk) 18:56, 26 March 2013 (UTC)Reply
  Done, they really wanted to create a modern atmosphere as opposed to a lot of the other midways at Cedar Point.-- Astros4477 (Talk) 00:36, 27 March 2013 (UTC)Reply
Ummm, a modern atmosphere with curved edges....still makes no sense to me. Oh well, its got a ref so its staying!--Dom497 (talk) 23:50, 27 March 2013 (UTC)Reply
  Fixed-- Astros4477 (Talk) 01:36, 26 March 2013 (UTC)Reply
  • "Luminosity performers do flash mobs..." - Do we know if they are doing that this year as well? If not, I think putting this into past tense might be the the best for now.--Dom497 (talk) 00:36, 26 March 2013 (UTC)Reply
Well not all the details have been released for this season's show so I think we should leave it until we know. I'd think it'll return.-- Astros4477 (Talk) 01:41, 26 March 2013 (UTC)Reply
Isn't it generally accepted that time formats are what it is located in? I don't think I've ever seen EST/CST/MST/PST in an article.-- Astros4477 (Talk) 01:41, 26 March 2013 (UTC)Reply
True, I don't know what I was typing, though I still believe am/pm should be included.--Dom497 (talk) 18:56, 26 March 2013 (UTC)Reply
  Done-- Astros4477 (Talk) 00:36, 27 March 2013 (UTC)Reply
  Done-- Astros4477 (Talk) 01:51, 26 March 2013 (UTC)Reply
  Done-- Astros4477 (Talk) 01:42, 28 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

*Ready to Go leads to a disambiguation page.--Dom497 (talk) 23:57, 27 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Fixed-- Astros4477 (Talk) 01:45, 28 March 2013 (UTC)Reply
  Done-- Astros4477 (Talk) 01:45, 28 March 2013 (UTC)Reply
  Done-- Astros4477 (Talk) 22:43, 29 March 2013 (UTC)Reply
Where do you think he is?-- Astros4477 (Talk) 22:43, 29 March 2013 (UTC)Reply
From the angle the video is at, looks like either in front or the front of the stage.--Dom497 (talk) 01:36, 30 March 2013 (UTC)Reply
I reworded it.-- Astros4477 (Talk) 18:44, 1 April 2013 (UTC)Reply
  • "The DJ then starts playing dance music and taking song requests from the crowd. People can also text shout-outs that appear on the screens." - Where does the source state this?--Dom497 (talk) 20:00, 28 March 2013 (UTC)Reply
I removed the first part but you can see the shout-outs on the screens in the video.-- Astros4477 (Talk) 18:46, 1 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

*"...balcony of the Coliseum along the main midway" - Source says ballroom, not coliseum.--Dom497 (talk) 20:00, 28 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

The ballroom is in the coliseum.-- Astros4477 (Talk) 22:44, 29 March 2013 (UTC)Reply
This is me being picky, but how do we know that?--Dom497 (talk) 01:36, 30 March 2013 (UTC)Reply
I could find a source but I don't think that's really necessary.-- Astros4477 (Talk) 18:41, 1 April 2013 (UTC)Reply
But than couldn't some assume that the ballroom is somewhere else?--Dom497 (talk) 21:23, 1 April 2013 (UTC)Reply
I added ballroom so there's no confusion.-- Astros4477 (Talk) 21:30, 1 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

*Any reviews from newspapers (or simply not anyone from the industry)?--Dom497 (talk) 20:00, 28 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

I looked when I wrote the article and I looked now and couldn't find anything.-- Astros4477 (Talk) 21:32, 1 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

*Refs 9 and 29 are missing publishers.--Dom497 (talk) 20:00, 28 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Done-- Astros4477 (Talk) 22:46, 29 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Sorry that this is taking so long...got some school stuff to worry about.--Dom497 (talk) 23:57, 27 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

That's ok, real life always comes first.-- Astros4477 (Talk) 01:45, 28 March 2013 (UTC)Reply
Finally done (though I may do one more thing if I feel like it)!--Dom497 (talk) 20:00, 28 March 2013 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Luminosity — Ignite the Night!. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:53, 20 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Luminosity — Ignite the Night!. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:08, 9 January 2018 (UTC)Reply