Talk:Luna Park

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Untitled

edit

Are all of the former and current Luna Parks throughout the world that exist or have existed related to the same parent company?—Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.65.109.102 (talkcontribs)

  • No, they can be categorized in a few ways: there were three or four which were connected directly to the Coney Island Luna Park and its designers; the Frederick Ingersoll Luna Parks (he was responsible for about 44); the ones between 1912 and 1945 which were essentially copycats of the previous Luna Parks; and the post-World War II Luna Parks that are basically "carrying on the tradition." In addition, every amusement park in Turkey (and, I think, Greece) is called "Luna Park" regardless of official name. 147.70.242.54 (talk) 01:57, 28 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Futurama Reference

edit

Futurama made reference to Luna Park in "The Series Has Landed." In this episode, a park of the same name is located on the moon. The mascot has a striking resemblance to the entrance in Sydney.

 

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Luna Park. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:17, 27 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 11 external links on Luna Park. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:35, 25 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Bad syntax

edit

This sentence is pretty bad:

Today, the term luna park or lunapark means "amusement park" in several European languages. These include Indo-European languages such as Polish, French, and Italian, as well as in Greek (λούνα παρκ, loúna park).[7] In Turkish, a Turkic language, lunapark means "funfair", a similar term.[8]

It suggests that the writer is unsure whether Greek is an Indo-European language or not; anyway the 'in' doesn't belong. It should read "such as Polish, French, Italian, as well as Greek" or, better yet, just "Polish, French, Italian, and Greek".

Also, what is the relevance, here, of the linguistic families to which these languages belong?